
Because the industry charged artists for everything, that put the artists on the line as "owners" of the work and its production, which means that now when they're looking to terminate old licensing agreements.
When computer programs came out it was decided that the underlying code was protectable as a literary work, insofar as it embodied the original expression of the programmer. Ideas and functions are beyond the purview of copyright law,[1] but patent law was extended to certain aspects of software to incentivize production of novel methods of computing…
The law tends to struggle as different technologies are introduced, but usually just tweaks the existing system, spins off some justification and calls it good. Many of the same issues bubbling up due to creative AI machines were addressed in 1884, when the Supreme Court upheld the power of Congress to extend copyright to photography.…