Patents are required to be non-obvious. In theory.
Ars Technica – Law and Disorder
- Prenda blows sanctions deadline, ordered to pay an extra $1,000 per day
- Reporters use Google, find breach, get branded as “hackers”
- Tim Cook tells Congress why Apple won’t move $100 billion back home
- Airbnb host gets fined $2,400 for breaking hotel laws
- Senate report shows Apple avoided billions in taxes on foreign income
Techdirt
- How Low Can Drones Go?
- Prenda Gets Some Tiny Bit Of Good News, As It May Get Out Of Two Critical Cases
- Ridiculous Timing: Obama Administration Responds To Spying On AP By Pushing Journalist Shield Law That Wouldn't Matter
- DailyDirt: Weapons In The Sky
- Bad Day For Prenda Continues: Judge Rejects Stay, Adds $1k Per Day For Each Day They Don't Pay Up
The Art Law Blog
- "So while Cariou v. Prince can rightly be considered a victory for appropriation art to some extent ..."
- Richard Dorment on the Warhol Foundation
- Six of one
- "Since the full price of artworks donated to charity are not tax deductible for the artist, new records are a major incentive for their participation."
- Much Better Than The Impractical Advice Panel
Daily Archives: June 19, 2012
Pin It!
Translator
